RSS
August 16, 2008 | | Comments 2

Miscanthus better than Switchgrass for Biofuel Production

A recent study demonstrates the capability of Miscanthus in producing ethanol.  The benefits of Switchgrass, in that in can grow in most any soil type, is perennial and easy to grow.  Advantages of MIscanthus are it grows quicker, in less acreage, and produces more ethanol.

Reprinted from ENS http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jul2008/2008-07-31-091.asp

CHAMPAIGN, Illinois, July 31, 2008 (ENS) – A giant perennial grass that tolerates poor soils, uses less acreage and produces more biofuel than either corn or switchgrass – it sounds too good to be true. But researchers at the University of Illinois have demonstrated that the the grass, Miscanthus x giganteus, outperforms current biofuels sources by a long shot.

Corn, switchgrass and Miscanthus have been grown side by side in experimental plots in Urbana, Illinois since 2005 in the largest field trials of their kind in the United States.

“What we’ve found with Miscanthus is that the amount of biomass generated each year would allow us to produce about two and a half times the amount of ethanol we can produce per acre of corn,” said University of Illinois crop sciences professor Stephen Long, who led the study.

University of Illinois crop sciences professor Stephen Long stands in a Miscanthus field. (Photo by Don Hamerman courtesy U. of I.)

Long is the deputy director of the BP-sponsored Energy Biosciences Institute, a multi-year, multi-institutional initiative aimed at finding low carbon or carbon neutral alternatives to petroleum fuels.

Using corn or switchgrass to produce enough ethanol to offset 20 percent of gasoline use – a current White House goal – would take 25 percent of current U.S. cropland out of food production, the researchers report.

Getting the same amount of ethanol from Miscanthus would require only 9.3 percent of current agricultural acreage.

In field trials in Illinois, researchers grew Miscanthus and switchgrass in adjoining plots. Miscanthus proved to be at least twice as productive as switchgrass.

In trials across Illinois, switchgrass, a perennial grass which, like Miscanthus, requires fewer chemical and mechanical inputs than corn, produced only about as much ethanol feedstock per acre as corn, Long said.

“It wasn’t that we didn’t know how to grow switchgrass because the yields we obtained were actually equal to the best yields that had been obtained elsewhere with switchgrass,” he said. Corn yields in Illinois are also among the best in the nation.

“One reason why Miscanthus yields more biomass than corn is that it produces green leaves about six weeks earlier in the growing season,” Long said. Miscanthus also stays green until late October in Illinois, while corn leaves wither at the end of August, he said.

The growing season for switchgrass is comparable to that of Miscanthus, but that grass is not nearly as efficient at converting sunlight to biomass as Miscanthus, found Frank Dohleman, a graduate student and co-author of the study.

“One of the criticisms of using any biomass as a biofuel source is it has been claimed that plants are not very efficient – about 0.1 percent efficiency of conversion of sunlight into biomass,” Long said. “What we show here is, on average, Miscanthus is in fact about one percent efficient, so about one percent of sunlight ends up as biomass.”

“Keep in mind that when we consider our energy use, a few hours of solar energy falling on the Earth are equal to all the energy that people use over a whole year, so you don’t really need that high an efficiency to be able to capture that in plant material and make use of it as a biofuel source,” he said.

The field trials also showed that Miscanthus is tolerant of poor soil quality, Long said.

“Our highest productivity is actually occurring in the south, on the poorest soils in the state,” he said. “So that also shows us that this type of crop may be very good for marginal land or land that is not even being used for crop production.”

Because Miscanthus is a perennial grass, it also accumulates much more carbon in the soil than an annual crop such as corn or soybeans, Long said.

“In the context of global climate change, that’s important because it means that by producing a biofuel on that land you’re taking carbon out of the atmosphere and putting it into the soil,” he said.

Using Miscanthus in an agricultural setting has not been without its challenges, explained Long. Because it is a sterile hybrid, it must be propagated by planting underground stems, called rhizomes.

This was initially a laborious process, Long said, but mechanization allows the team to plant about 15 acres a day.

In Europe, where Miscanthus has been grown for more than a decade, patented farm equipment can plant about 50 acres of Miscanthus rhizomes a day, he said.

Once established, Miscanthus returns annually without need for replanting. If harvested in December or January, after nutrients have returned to the soil, it requires little fertilizer.

This sterile form of Miscanthus has not been found to be invasive in Europe or the United States, Long said.

There are at least a dozen companies building or operating plants in the United States to produce ethanol from the non-edible parts of plants, called lignocellulosic feedstocks, and companies are propagating Miscanthus rhizomes for commercial sale, Long said.

Although research has led to improvements in productivity and growers are poised to begin using it as a biofuels crop on a large scale, Miscanthus is in its infancy as an agricultural product, Long said.

“Keep in mind that this Miscanthus is completely unimproved, so if we were to do the sorts of things that we’ve managed to do with corn, where we’ve increased its yield threefold over the last 50 years, then it’s not unreal to think that we could use even less than 10 percent of the available agricultural land,” Long said. “And if you can actually grow it on non-cropland that would be even better.”

Researchers at the University of Illinois are exploring all aspects of biofuels production, from the development of feedstocks such as Miscanthus, to planting, harvest, storage, transport, conversion to biofuels and carbon sequestration.

Copyright Environment News Service (ENS) 2008. All rights reserved.

Entry Information

Filed Under: Alternative EnergyGlobal Warming

Tags:

About the Author:

RSSComments: 2  |  Post a Comment  |  Trackback URL

  1. It may not take much water to grow this crop but how much water does it take to produce the ethanol?
    This is a very good way to capture some of the carbon in the air and that will be some help but if we put it right back it may be a useless endever.
    The best bet is to use the sun and nuks. The new nuks can burn all the old fuel rods that are so difficult to store and can power the country for about 200 years and what is left is about 1% of what is now left over.

  2. Numbers are something like 4 gallons for every gallon of ethanol produced. I agree on the Sun. I think we can do nukes, but I don’t think the industry can move fast enough and cost effectively. A lot of renewable including solar can be done for the cost of a single nuclear plant. Some estimates put Nuclear at 2-3x cost per KWH of solar or wind. Of course you get more bang for your buck with nuclear from an efficiency standpoint.

RSSPost a Comment  |  Trackback URL